By now every American who cares to know anything about anything knows that growing percentages of Americans either believe Obama to be a crypto-Muslim or state that they do not know what his religion is. And any American who did not consciously choose not to know the truth has known since early in his presidential campaign that Obama is a Christian. Thus, it is safe to say that an enormous and growing number of Americans have chosen to believe a lie.
In that scenario, our explanations and presentations of truth will have no effect. You cannot change the mind of the person who effectively says, "I don't care what the facts are, I believe X."
So, if all our explanations and protestations are not going to have the reasonable effect we hope for, why not change tactics? When people go off about Obama being a Muslim, why don't we reply in the affirmative: "Yeah! Isn't that great! We live in a country that is able to look past a candidate's religion and vote based on their political record and promise."
I hate sloganeering, but perhaps a campaign of slogans is in order? Something like:
AMERICA! CHRISTIAN ENOUGH TO ELECT A MUSLIM PRESIDENT! ARE WE CHRISTIAN ENOUGH TO LIVE UP TO THE POTENTIAL?OK. OK. Of course, my "Christian" is in quotes there. The point is, if there is little or no chance that we can use reasoned discourse and sound evidence to convince our fellow Americans that they believe a lie about the President, maybe we need to proclaim how wonderful it is that their lie is "true."
I mean, most of us who are reasonably progressive in our thinking would never vote for a candidate solely because of identity issues. But we do long for the day when it is equally possible for a woman or a Jew or a lesbian/ gay/ bisexual/ transgender person or a Zoroastrian or an atheist or a non-lawyer/ non-rich person or a Muslim to become president. So let's approach it from that angle! If a legitimately elected official is cast into doubt by lies being spread about their identity, I say the proper response is to celebrate the goodness of that identity's finally being represented in that office.
This is not just a political issue here. It is ethical and religious. Among the seven principles Unitarian Universalist congregations covenant to affirm and promote as members of the UUA, the first six are explicitly applicable here:
- The inherent worth and dignity of every person;
- Justice, equity and compassion in human relations;
- Acceptance of one another and encouragement to spiritual growth in our congregations;
- A free and responsible search for truth and meaning;
- The right of conscience and the use of the democratic process within our congregations and in society at large;
- The goal of world community with peace, liberty and justice for all;
For UUs and for anyone who agrees with the intent of those covenanted principles, what is going on in the US right now is a travesty and an abomination. And being unable effectively to oppose it in a head-on assault because of the psychological realities involved, let's do what we can. Let's celebrate the identity that is being smeared.
I'm an American, and I'm proud of my Muslim president!


8 responses:
I don't know why some people are so upset that 20% of Americans believe the President is Muslim. That's about the same number as those who believe that the CIA and Mossad committed 9/11, that Apollo 11 was faked on a Hollywood soundstage, that a CIA sniper on a grassy knoll shot JFK, that all our modern technology was reverse engineered from an alien ship that crashed in New Mexico, that Homeland Security has concentration camps built and waiting for the coming dictatorship, that Bush dynamited the levies in New Orleans to kill black people, and that aliens regularly abduct people to steal their precious bodily fluids.
But aliens DO regularly abduct people to steal their precious bodily fluids. ;)
Paul I love this piece it makes so much sense in such a crazy world!
Pamela
The following reply was posted by TLB to Paul's Facebook page:
Often I can't accurately determine "tone" online. Paul, are you being serious or not on your blog with this proposal? If you are being serious, I wouldn't go so far as you propose. I would prefer to say, "I'm an American. Even if the President were Muslim, I'd be proud of him/her."
Mmm, let me equivocate, [TB]. :)
I might have pushed the edge a little bit, but essentially I was serious.
I would use language similar to what you suggest if I thought the person I was speaking to was susceptible to reason. But seriously doubting that (for reasons mentioned above) I think I might say something like "Yeah! Isn't that great! We live in a country that is able to look past a candidate's religion and vote based on their political record and promise."
Or, yes, even: "I'm an American, and I'm proud of my Muslim President."
But there was a parable about casting pearls before swine whose lesson indicates that one should not (necessarily) attempt to engage in reasoned discourse with the insistently or persistently unreasonable.
If an individual believes aliens abduct people and steal their body fluids that individual probably should take their paranoia to Doctor Stephen Greer.
RW posted the following response on Paul's FB page:
The inherent racism that these people display is sickening. This presumption that Americans are born Christian is completely irrational. Racism is irrational, and so I agree with Paul. The only way, it seems to me, to deal with irrational people is be a bit radical with our response.
The following exchange in response to this post took place between MF and Paul on Paul's FB page:
MF: maybe religion has nothing to do with it, in sense of ones decission how he/she is taking initiative to get things done!!!
Paul: Exactly! Our Constitution requires that the Government set no religious test for those who would serve in public office. Certain people try to whip up public sentiment in such a way as to trump that aspect of separation of Church and State.
MF: well, been around long enough to know what this does.. hate..
Post a Comment